Ste-Foy Movies

A Beautiful Mind

A Beautiful Mind

Score: 7.5 / 10

Release Date: 25th Anniversary
Director: Ron Howard
Producer: Brian Grazer, Ron Howard
Studio: Universal Pictures
Starring: Russell Crowe, Ed Harris, Jennifer Connelly, Paul Bettany, Judd Hirsch, Adam Goldberg, Christopher Plummer, Josh Lucas, Anthony Rapp, Vivien Cardone
Genre: Drama
Running Time: 134 minutes

Write a Review


A Beautiful Mind movie reviews

  • A Beautiful Mind

    Sunday, July 18, 2004 4:07:35 AM | (age group: 35–49) | M

    I`ve seen both the "A BEAUTIFUL MIND" and the " PIANSIT", and I believe that Russell Crowe was 100% qualified to get the Oscar. I`ve really enjoyed watching the movies, specially the first one.

  • A Beautiful Mind

    Tuesday, January 20, 2004 5:16:30 AM | (age group: 25-34) | F

    It`s an innovation and Russell Crowe was very sensitive.What a talent!!

  • A Beautiful Mind

    Friday, December 26, 2003 1:17:56 AM | (age group: 2-17) | F

    this movie is the worset movie i ever saw

  • A Beautiful Mind

    Sunday, August 24, 2003 8:39:05 PM | (Age Not Specified)

    Captivated! ..but unless you are into drama and fascinations of the mind/brain, you may not appreciate it as much.

  • A Beautiful Mind

    Wednesday, May 21, 2003 1:51:18 PM | (age group: 18-24) | F

    A great movie with a good storyline and characters. It gave a real insight to people who suffer and live with szophenia. A true Oscar winner!

  • A Beautiful Mind

    Thursday, May 1, 2003 1:24:23 PM | (Age Not Specified)

    it was great!!!

  • A Beautiful Mind

    Friday, March 14, 2003 8:22:22 PM | (age group: 25-34) | F

    Russell Crowe was awesome

  • A Beautiful Mind

    Friday, January 17, 2003 4:01:00 PM | (age group: 18-24) | F

    Great Acting and a wonderful story!

  • A Beautiful Mind

    Wednesday, November 6, 2002 8:24:36 PM | (Age Not Specified)

    Good movie

  • A Beautiful Mind

    Saturday, September 21, 2002 2:27:43 PM | (age group: 50 or over.) | M

    Basically a very mediocre film that misses the mark in presenting the `beauty of the mind` (Nash`s) except by alluding to his mathamatical accomplishments without really presenting and ellaborating on the `beauty`. Also fails to present schizophrenia accurately. It misleads viewers into a really unfair to suffers and treaters alike, a depiction of vivid, visual hallucinations (which is so atypical of the illness so as even raise the question as to the specificity of the diagnosis). It does little to clarify the specific treatment(s) he was provided and/or was non-compliant with and failed to present the highly relevant historical context of t